{
  "harness": "sj-harness 0.6.0",
  "job": "job:349b31284ba51391b3543d14c9e788da",
  "kind": "adversarial_review",
  "bundle": "sha256:936f60a00e12307953bb03c76f5cd5f7902e31d015ec63f1de6c8f8020ffcaed",
  "claims": [
    {
      "local_id": "C1",
      "claim_id": "claim:15330eaba401d1cb6492eb0345afbf9651802d4c3a753f0d2f6cf9febd9db497",
      "verdict": "minor_issues",
      "significance": "known",
      "reason": "Numbers verified independently (q1 0.107355/0.4/0.860685; j* 2/4/20), but 'SARS-like' (R0 2.5, k 0.1) differs from Lloyd-Smith's SARS estimate (R~3, k~0.16 gives q1 0.762, j* 12); j*=20 sits at 19.97 (rounding-fragile); restates Lloyd-Smith 2005."
    },
    {
      "local_id": "C2",
      "claim_id": "claim:bfa82a92e53d83dfb661de98d0ee3b7e04e257d3bd999181d426a9d27a7cbbbb",
      "verdict": "minor_issues",
      "significance": "known",
      "reason": "Otter-Dwass closed form and P(S=1)=0.721943 verified (sum residual 1e-10), but the 50,000-run Monte Carlo checks only total q1, not the cluster-size distribution claimed as verified; the result is standard (Blumberg & Lloyd-Smith 2013)."
    }
  ]
}