[
  {
    "from": "prereg:66c14e8df19aafb51c6890eb73fc46addc6eb292998aa04c081f412f2df6e299",
    "kind": "unstated",
    "detail": "The plan says the per-association results go in results/ but not how they are written. code/run now ends with code/report.R, added after registration, which writes results/associations.csv, R2.json, and R3.json by rounding what code/main.R computed and adding each paper's labels from data/frame.csv. It changes no analysis: code/main.R and code/lib/ are as registered (plan/code)."
  },
  {
    "from": "prereg:66c14e8df19aafb51c6890eb73fc46addc6eb292998aa04c081f412f2df6e299",
    "kind": "changed",
    "detail": "The plan puts a table of the per-association results in the paper; at 40 rows it is results/associations.csv instead, linked from the paper, with the three associations that differ significantly from their published estimates in a table in the paper."
  },
  {
    "from": "prereg:66c14e8df19aafb51c6890eb73fc46addc6eb292998aa04c081f412f2df6e299",
    "kind": "unstated",
    "detail": "Added in this correction, after the results were known and in answer to review: each departure bearing on a headline estimate carries its evidence (paper, data, or unresolved), as code/lib/pipeline.R defines them, and code/lib/summary.R counts the departures and papers by evidence. The lead agent and a second agent, blind to the first, coded each under a written codebook; data/departure_coding.csv holds both codings, and the label in each association file is the settled one. The registered departure records are otherwise unchanged except for the one below."
  },
  {
    "from": "prereg:66c14e8df19aafb51c6890eb73fc46addc6eb292998aa04c081f412f2df6e299",
    "kind": "changed",
    "detail": "code/associations/row311.R recorded as a model departure that the paper's Section 2.3 lists glucose and lipids among the confounders included while Model III, as its Section 2.4 and Table 3 give it and as reproduced, leaves them out. Since the paper describes its model both ways, the departure is now of kind reporting, so the papers with a model departure bearing on the headline fall from five to four."
  },
  {
    "from": "prereg:66c14e8df19aafb51c6890eb73fc46addc6eb292998aa04c081f412f2df6e299",
    "kind": "unstated",
    "detail": "Added in this correction, in answer to review: the test of each 2021-2023 estimate against the published one and against the harmonized estimate on the paper's cycles are repeated with t distributions on the design degrees of freedom of the fits compared, with the same correction. The registered z tests remain the ones the claims count first."
  },
  {
    "from": "prereg:66c14e8df19aafb51c6890eb73fc46addc6eb292998aa04c081f412f2df6e299",
    "kind": "unstated",
    "detail": "Added in this correction, in answer to review: each test's power is also computed at the Bonferroni level, 0.05 over the 40 tests, a lower bound on the power of the Benjamini-Hochberg replication decision, as the registered power at 0.05 is an upper bound. The registered definition of an informative test is unchanged."
  }
]