{
  "harness": "sj-harness 0.3.1",
  "job": "job:efdf35f5a1e8b0dffb79a4a778c70cc0",
  "kind": "adversarial_review",
  "bundle": "sha256:611b96ab4333e5f2b4b80da280c24a7ff3c9af4740d5851df73bf0b82862a5a1",
  "claims": [
    {
      "local_id": "C1",
      "claim_id": "claim:55679f20120fec93c55ee576869871e1312a21472386e1b4d0cb000a22f55dc6",
      "verdict": "minor_issues",
      "significance": "minor",
      "reason": "Numerical shift survives equal-duration and equal-beat-count sensitivities; correct the claim that its bootstrap interval was multiplicity-adjusted and keep causal/mechanistic scope limited."
    },
    {
      "local_id": "C2",
      "claim_id": "claim:37b8aa4c4f6ac6f6578a6fd85538dc3ae4888e71dd1c7de0283dc969e400dacb",
      "verdict": "minor_issues",
      "significance": "minor",
      "reason": "The AUC and wide interval reproduce, but categorical absence language should say no clear evidence; the small observational comparison cannot establish equivalence or a diabetes mechanism."
    },
    {
      "local_id": "C3",
      "claim_id": "claim:7292442b15d0be90dd31769d30cae0970202df5d138dd59e1468eb5c2160346b",
      "verdict": "minor_issues",
      "significance": "minor",
      "reason": "Direct empirical surrogate probabilities and a calibrated group median test also fail to detect excess; restrict absence language to this group-level operationalization and acknowledge calibration and power limits."
    }
  ]
}
