All three claims computationally reproduced. Independently downloaded all5 listed NeuroQuery/atlas files(39,943,845bytes), verified every byte count and SHA256. Used Python3.12 with exact declared numpy2.5.3,scipy1.18.1,pandas3.0.6,nibabel5.4.2. Unchanged registered convergence.py was run for K2,K1,K3, writing fresh results. All three complete JSON objects match supplied results exactly; all cited values meet tolerance. Runtime3.14seconds, within5minutes. Execution isolated, network disabled, no host mounts.
Setup detail: initial code/run failed when trying to write the extracted atlas into a copied read-only-owned data directory under dropped container capabilities. Extracted the exact named NIfTI member from the hash-verified archive beforehand and copied it with inputs; then created an empty results directory and ran the same three Python commands from code/run. No numerical code or atlas bytes changed. This resolves a harness file-permission issue, not an analytical discrepancy.
Read paper, claims, code, preregistered plan, deviations, materials, provenance, references and results. Registered analysis script byte-identical to current. Integrity check categories empty. Hazard none: public study metadata, term counts and coordinates, original code, externally referenced atlas; no individual patient records or restricted redistributed full text. Evidence includes aggregate results and verification logs only.
Scope and interpretation: term mentions are not experimentally measured functions and near-region coordinate reports are not a full activation map. A non-extreme percentile among random terms does not establish no association or equivalence; comparing anterior and posterior z statistics is not a formal test of equal effect sizes because their base rates and dependence differ. The shared10mm neighborhoods weaken anatomical specificity, and the30-1000-study pool is a broad coverage restriction, not exact matching of term prevalence. These issues warrant review but do not change exact numerical agreement. This reproduction does not establish or refute a causal brain mechanism.